Skip to main content

So the CBO report came out stating that raising the minimum wage to $10.10 would help 16.5 million people and lift one million Americans out of poverty, but at the temporary cost of 500,000 jobs.

Cue the Republican talking heads running with the one aspect of that report that fits their "Obama is a job-killer" talking points and running with it.

You won't hear a word of the 16.5 million it will help, just the 500k jobs that will be temporarily lost.

Which begs the question, which number is bigger? 16.5 million or 500k?

Yes, this debate is that stupid, and we should laugh in their faces for debasing this debate in such a way.

This has been a recurring theme with Republicans and CBO reports, just glom onto the one thing that supports your case and ignore all those other stupid numbers and facts and stuff. Who cares if this policy proposal would help 97% of the people effected by it. We all know Republicans don't believe in arithmetic.

Never mind how we could help 16,5 million Americans, 500,000 sure sounds like a big number, doesn't it? Scary, scary.

Now, we could go into a ton of details about how some of those 500k jobs might be people who only have a second job because they can't afford to get by on one minimum wage job, as David Dayen pointed out on his twitter feed, but math is hard and boring. Can you make this conversation more stupid and focus only on the negative things? Thanks.

Thus we get S.E.Cupp and the usual shills braying about OBAMA TOOK R JERBS! while totally dismissing the 16.5 million people we could help. No matter what Obama wants to do the cup is always at least half job-killing uber-tyrant.

And watch how our idiot media runs with that 500k jobs lost part in their title while leaving the 16.5M people helped to be mentioned in the third paragraph.

Cause we all know any money the working poor get because of a raise in the minimum wage will just get stowed away in their Cayman Island bank accounts, it's not like that money would become sorely needed disposable income that will go right back into the economy, boosting demand, or anything, you stupid commie.

But lets go a bit further into that talking point. So raising wages is bad? Getting a raise is BAD? It used to be Republicans would sell you on getting a good job, now you are just supposed to be grateful just for having a job, any job, no matter how crappy the pay is, even if that job pays so little you need food assistance to survive, which Republicans will take away while calling you lazy and saying you want a handout. If raises for the poor are bad, does that mean a raise for the rich is bad too? Are all raises bad, or just the raises that don't go to the "Job Creator" class of sneering one percenters? If a raise for the working poor doesn't trickle down why should I believe that a raise for the rich does? Listen, I never bought the whole trickle down malarkey anyway but it is breath taking to learn that the Republican party doesn't believe in trickle down either, not when that trickle isn't starting directly with the wealthiest among us.

And if conservative want to stick with the idea that giving people a raise is bad for the economy I'd love to see some Democrat propose a compensation freeze for the Fortune 500 CEO's of America, you know, cause getting a raise hurts the economy and all.

If Republicans want to run on "Nobody should get a raise" let them go ahead and run with that, but don't let them bullshit you into thinking that 500k is a bigger number than 16.5 million.

Side note: I love you guys. Thanks for the moral support. I really needed that. I am really considering doing a monthly subscription thru paypal or something to help keep me writing and my rent paid and stuff. Let me know what you think in the comments below.

Peace and love to one and all, I will be around in the comments for a bit to share your thoughts and ideas.



Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

skybluewater, Chris Bowers, Alumbrados, Sylv, True North, Emerson, Shockwave, chuco35, eeff, MarkInSanFran, whenwego, high uintas, Texknight, NMRed, psnyder, NYC Sophia, pat bunny, Lawrence, HeyMikey, Catte Nappe, lcrp, riverlover, econlibVA, Chris Reeves, Sembtex, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, rapala, Dirk McQuigley, maybeeso in michigan, Bluesee, NoMoreLies, sc kitty, Simplify, basquebob, dewtx, Brooke In Seattle, wildcat6, Kayakbiker, markdd, kaliope, FindingMyVoice, Eileen B, kathny, begone, cybersaur, cookseytalbott, Lefty Coaster, ER Doc, middleagedhousewife, AllDemsOnBoard, onionjim, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, OHdog, Thinking Fella, camlbacker, ColoTim, puakev, yoduuuh do or do not, FishOutofWater, Dave in Northridge, artisan, Wreck Smurfy, TDDVandy, TomP, JDWolverton, gundyj, mconvente, Scioto, GAS, Sixty Something, Youffraita, Involuntary Exile, bythesea, elwior, jamess, monkeybrainpolitics, Lujane, hwmnbn, Jeff Y, Tross, maggiejean, Louisiana 1976, Bule Betawi, AntonBursch, cantelow, CanyonWren, MKSinSA, bfitzinAR, kevinpdx, deviant24x, Just Bob, awcomeon, indie17, mookins, Polly Syllabic, ATFILLINOIS, JoanMar, kalika, kenwards, ericlewis0, soaglow, Actbriniel, slice, sostos, jardin32, FarWestGirl, thomask, BarackStarObama, poliwrangler, VTCC73, Vatexia, Democrats Ramshield, Hayate Yagami, No one gets out alive, anodnhajo, Siri, IndieGuy, 2thanks, FloridaSNMOM, peachcreek, Syoho, radical simplicity, BusyinCA, MartyM, ZatCSU, Silvia Nightshade, Lily O Lady, Smoh, BadKitties, peterfallow, Halfton81, TopCat, Dodgerdog1, Darwinian Detritus, ginimck, Lennykat, wilywascal, JusticeSeeker68

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site